Ashoka Mody, a visiting professor of International Economic Policy at
the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton
University, has very clearly summarized the continued predicament of the Greek
economy in a recent Project Syndicate post,
here.
Excerpt:
… “the very premise of the current deal and the expectations it sets out
are wrong. First, the notion that there is a smooth transition path for the
debt/GDP ratio from 200% (current) to 124% (in 2020) is fanciful. Second, even
if, by some miracle, Greece did reach the 124% mark by 2020, the claim that its
debt will be “sustainable” is absurd.”
For the moment the German government is willing to continue to finance
Athens, as Nouriel Roubini notes, because as long as Spain and Italy remain
vulnerable, a Greek blowup and/or euro exit could spark contagion of interest
risk premiums and defaults in the Eurozone south before the German election of
September 2013, jeopardizing Ms. Merkel chances of winning another term.
But assuming that the Greek unsustainable mid-term financial pseudo equilibrium
can survive until next fall, despite a forecast of – 6% of real GDP growth this
year and – 4% in 2013 (according to the IMF which has been repeatedly over
optimistic in its past projections), the end of next year will be a time of
reckoning.
The question is: wouldn’t an exit of Germany (and possibly of some other
northern countries) from the euro be more advantageous for all the European
economies than an exit of a heavily indebted southern country whose debt in
euros would be magnified (in its own currency, thus relatively to its tax
receipts and GDP) by the inevitable large depreciation of this newly recreated
national currency, leading to a severe bankruptcy that could also jeopardize
its creditors and start a contagious process in the South?
As I claimed in several
past posts, Germany is the key.
No comments:
Post a Comment