Even France, which started from a higher income per capita in 1950,
having escaped the massive destructions that WWII brought upon Germany, still
did better in 2008.
Gdp per capita
(1990 International Geary-Kharmis dollars)
Statistics on World Population
www.ggdc.net/maddison/Historical…/horizontal-file
1950 1970 1990 2008
Austria 3 706 9 747 16 895
24 131
France 5 186
11 410 17 647 22 223
Germany 3 881 10 839 15 929 20 801
Italy 3 502 9 719 16 313 19 909
Spain 2 189 6 319 12 055 19 706
Total WE 5 005 10 925 16 797 22 246
Total 12 Western Europe
(Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy,
Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom).
I can find only one explanation for the inflated reputation of Germany:
its low inflation in the medium run and thus the high value of the DM. But a
hard currency is not the key to economic performance and welfare.
Now regarding the slightly better performance of Germany in the current
crisis, since 2008, it is completely clear that prices and wages have been
growing more rapidly in southern Europe, compared to the German evolution,
since the creation of the euro in 1999 (see
here, and also Mark Thoma
here, as well as Paul Krugman here).
It follows that the German exports towards the so-called “PIIGS” (or by
the less derogatory acronym “GIPSIS”) are growingly subsidized by the
undervaluation of the real intra euro “shadow exchange rate” between members of
the zone. This is unfair competition, built in and locked in the euro.
The recent relative performance of the German economy is thus not due to
“German virtue”, as politicians everywhere would have us believe, but to an
unfair rigging of foreign trade. The real culprit of other nations’ trade
disequilibrium is not China. It is to be found in Frankfurt.
No comments:
Post a Comment